A while back, I wrote in "Six Steps to Getting Honest Critical Feedback" -
I think that’s true, but I still try to almost never give negative criticism to anyone, ever.
“As a general rule…people ask for advice only in order not to follow it; or if they do follow it, in order to have someone to blame for giving it.” — From Alexandre Dumas’s “The Three Musketeers”
I’ve found the vast majority of people will never take any criticism you give them, will be upset at you for criticizing them, and will dislike you even more if you were right.
I’ve gotten this wrong plenty, and still get it wrong sometimes. Most of the time, giving critical advice to someone is a very, very bad idea. I can only think of a few exceptions to that rule.
It's just a lesson borne out of experience. The vast majority of people react poorly to unsolicited advice. Even the most patient, enlightened, introspective people usually don't react well to unsolicited advice.
Oh, sure, you can share a recipe on how to cook a dish with someone, or tell them that getting a rice cooker would make their life easier. But if you advise someone to change what they're currently doing, more than 9 out of 10 times it's not going to go well. Maybe it won't be a disaster , but it's usually not a good idea.
That said, I was kind of bummed out when I wrote that. Huh, that's too bad. Is that really how the world is? Never give advice unsolicited, and also be careful even before giving solicited-for advice unless you know the person really, truly, actually wants it?
And it strikes me - unsolicited critical advice usually goes over poorly. Defense mechanisms and identity and things like that get in the way. But I think the world could probably use more unsolicited encouragement, and that rarely blows up.
So I think, if you really want to be a benevolent advice-giver, maybe lean towards encouraging people instead of advising them. Instead of, "You ought to quit your job," perhaps instead, "You know, I always thought you'd be awesome at running your own company."
Things like that. It's more subtle, much more palatable. Yeah, unsolicited critical advice is still a huge no-no, but unsolicited encouragement is good.
I think this quote fits well:
"Don't believe your friends when they ask you to be honest with them. All they really want is to be maintained in the good opinion they have of themselves." -Camus, from The Stranger
Whats interesting is he goes on to say something like "even if they ask for honesty, it just means they want a reason to believe your lies." Really opened my eyes to how people want to be treated, though I often forget this.
It's good to know a little psychology when advising people. A perception check is a good one, stating the behavior, giving two interpretations and asking which one is right.
Advising might not seem like something crucial to success, but it can be the difference between keeping a friend and driving them away. So like with all things your uncertain about, do some research, or a quick Google search, and learn about it.
This post didn't turn out how I expected it to.. posting it anyway because some content is better then no content at all. So i hope there will be other comments i can read in response to the post,
By the way, advice I tell myself on helping others is: "no matter how great my advice feels: Imagine you’re advising a mother she isn’t raising her child well and you want to tell her how to raise it better." -- http://joshuaspodek.com/unsolicited_advice
These words have served me well. You never know how attached someone is to whatever you want to advise them on.
The best method to get meaningful advice I've ever come across is Marshall Goldsmith's "Feedforward." I'd summarize it here, but his site gives the best description: http://www.marshallgoldsmithlibrary.com/cim/articles_display.php?aid=110
I use his advice regularly to get great advice. It's trivially simple to implement, effective, and builds relationships. I use his advice for clients I coach and in all my seminars on leadership and personal development.
About three years ago, I read the excellent book Never Eat Alone by Keith Ferrazzi. At that time, I made a list of the top 5-10 people in my life that I was to and had similar goals with. I sent out emails to them every once a month with what I was working on.
Eventually, I fell off from this habit. Not sure why - I'd had gotten good advice, stayed in touch with people I like, and it was a positive experience. I started re-thinking building my counsel a little over a year ago.
The challenge is, I've got a diverse set of goals and ideas. I write, I do business, I travel, I create art, I adventure, I'm looking to establish a strong family, and so on. I have friends who are writers or artists that aren't interested in business. I've got friends in business that pretty much always stick to their one city. I know guys who are pretty simple, work a normal job, don't make any art or do any entrepreneurship, but have very strong and good families. I know very successful businessmen who travel and adventure, but aren't interested in having kids.
So I was thinking - how do I balance this all on my counsel?
And eventually, the idea hits me. I need multiple, relevant counsels.
Back when I used to help Mystery run workshops, we had a division of labor. He did most of the teaching, I did most of the organizing, and he made most of the decisions. Our program was three nights in the field: Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, and two days of seminar. At one point Mystery decided that students could no longer take seminar and workshop during the same weekend. They would have to come one weekend for the seminar, and then the following for the workshop. This was great for local students, but a huge hassle for anyone traveling.
No amount of convincing would change Mystery's mind on this. I tried, of course, explaining that the reason we had fewer and fewer students was because no one wanted to fly out two weekends in a row. He wouldn't budge. Mystery is stubborn.
At the time this was frustrating, and even mind boggling-- how could someone so smart make such a bad decision and not listen to reason?
There's another side to being stubborn, though. When he was around twenty one, Mystery was a virgin who was bad with girls. Many young men have been in this position, and most of them never really solved their problem. But mystery was stubborn. He spent his last couple dollars every day taking a bus downtown so that he could go to nightclubs and observe the dynamics between men and women. He took notes, he pondered, he came up with theories, and he tested them.