This is a very interesting problem that frequently crosses my thoughts. The growing discrepancy between the modern civilized environment and the human animal little changed in fifty thousand years.
Short of using genetic engineering to realign our bodies with our newly created environment, there isn’t much we can do physically – biological evolution is too slow a process. Our bodies need to be physically active, yet our society no longer requires us to be. Often we have to go out of our way to be active. Bad food tastes better than good food, since in developed countries at least, food is plentiful. Eating your fill of high energy density food is now a very bad thing to do, since you can now do that multiple times every day.
If physical evolution isn’t an option, then mental adaptation is the only real alternative. Our minds have to be trained to be aware of our bodies limitations. I think that willpower is the dominant trait possessed by those who best adapt to modern society. You have to be willing to force your body to act against it’s instincts.
That comment is so perfectly dense with information... one of the most spot-on accurate comments I've seen on this site. Matches my exact beliefs - willpower and thinking ability as chief traits for success in the modern world, biological evolution too slow to provide a relief, and genetic engineering as a potential to remove or regulate unwanted destructive urges.
Really good stuff. Matches my thoughts almost exactly. Thanks Michael.
interesting it will be to see the effects of this unnatural society we have accepted and what it may bring forth as we move forward.
'In an artificial world, only extremists live naturally.'
In this essay Paul Graham brings food analogies to also illustrate his views on the artificial way people are organised in our 'unnatural' society.
Coffee, alcohol and cigarettes are pretty good examples that you can acquire taste for just about anything, though there is the argument that all of those give you a buzz that other foods don't (either through caffeine, nicotine, or good old fashion drunkenness). No matter how much you're into lettuce, I don't think your brain is going to fire the same way it does after a shot of Jager.
But, just about everyone I talk to who has become a vegetarian says some variant of "Ugh, I couldn't eat meat anymore, it grosses me out." I've met more than few people who just tried eating vegetarian for a month or so and then found they couldn't go back to their old eating habits because their tastes had fundamentally changed and they no longer liked meat. Our brains are wired to crave fats, starches and sugars, so if you could develop a distaste for meat, I would imagine you could do it with pretty much anything.
Can we control what food tastes good?
I think this question is important. I know for me the answer is yes and I am sure it is the same for almost everyone else out there. I personally hated Nato and wanted to like it because Japanese people think it`s funny that foreigners can`t eat this food. It was described to me as ``rotten soybeans``. What I did was keep eating it, little by little and after 2 months I started to like it. By 6 moths I was asking for it and now I eat if every morning for breakfast and love it because `now` it tastes great to me and it is really good for you. If you need more evidence of this just look at the number of smokers in the world. None of them took a first puff and said `wow delicious!` Same is true with acquired tastes of coffee and beer and countless others. I haven`t tried to make something good taste bad though but I think associating it with bad feelings and mental images could easily do the trick. For instance if every time you saw junk food you got the image of a fad slob with his arteries cloged it might not tasted so good. This way `will power` isn`t really needed because you start to want food that is good for you (Natao) and hate junk food. So you go about life eating what you have conditioned yourself to want and love it every minute.
Just a thought.
This is absolutely true. Even ignoring the tsunami of mindless drivel that fills much of the media these days, there is such an abundance of information available these days that it would be utterly self destructive to try and pursue every opportunity for learning.
I have a natural tendency to want to study everything I come across and have to force restraint on myself here. The modern world makes it very easy to spend your entire life learning only to reach old age never having done anything productive with the knowledge.
I've thought recently that there ought to exist a fraternal organization of men who are committed to developing each other develop taste, strength, intelligence, wisdom, etc. I think someone with reach and perspective like Sebastian's could start this.
Coming from the traditional western philosophical perspective, I consider virtue a condition for happiness in any age. Willpower is required because virtue is a species of habit: a propensity to morally good action developed by a pattern of morally good choices.
I believe this principle applies to the life of the mind as well as the life of the body. Human nature has a natural desire to know. In an environment of informational scarcity, unfettered curiosity is not too perverting. However, in our environment of informational excess, unfettered curiosity is a destructive vice. Intellectual fruitfulness requires intentional restriction of information flow. Furnish your mind with the insights of the greatest authors of the ages, not popular blogs and best-selling books tailored to the tastes of the contemporary market. Extract the good you read and make it your own; commit it to memory and take care not to fill your memory with drivel. Above all, spend more time thinking and working than you spend immersed in the thoughts of others.
My newest tracking. Previously:
What Gets Measured, Gets Managed - why tracking is so effective
The Evolution of My Time/Habit/Life Tracking - how I started tracking, and some helpful guidelines on starting your tracking.
Here's my newest template, I'm bolding the changes:
------------------------------------------- START OF DAY ROUTINE: Time awake: Total sleep: Vitamin C and Fish oil: Stretching: Situps: Exercise (walk/run/other): Brush/floss: Listen to audio:Calories: Breathe: Borderlands: Calendar, anything interesting/time sensitive? What is my most key objective for the day? Planning:Gratitude: ------------------------------------------- REMEMBER: *Intelligent internet usage *Be decisive. Look at it once, make a decision, done. *Stop and reflect periodically*Make WAR on Procrastination ------------------------------------------- PEOPLE: Blog post: New People: Current people: Help someone: Consorting: Emails in box, start: Emails in box, finish (and - why they there?): ------------------------------------------- TIME TRACKING:
What started out as my exploration of an age-old question: whether total nerds have a chance at snagging highly desired women ripples into a topic that permeates into a thorough exploration of everything regarding the enigma we call 'love' and how it may not be as magical as we first deem it to be.
Reupdate: 3/14/13 Didn't really mean to update on Valentine's Day but there we go. I rescind my 51/49 soul/body split I mentioned in the 3/13 update after responding to Zach's post on Sebastian Marshall's blog http://sebastianmarshall.com/dont-underestimate-biochemistry. I now believe it is a dynamic split that changes based on situation.
Update: 3/13/13 In yet another update of this post's evolution the original question has been staked in the heart by Tynan's latest post Not that kind of person. I am now more convinced than ever that there are no 'pre-sets' in life and the only barriers we put up are the ones of our own making. Not everyone starts on even-footing and some have advantages over others but in the long run for most things we are self-defined. For the longest time I've tackled a deeper philosophical question - is the body a victim of biological processes or are biological processes controlled by the body? (ie can we use willpower alone to induce biological change) Are human personalities just a sum of biochemical reactions or is the human persona a product of the 'soul'? I now believe that we have a lot more power than we give ourselves credit for and even though our bodies and higher aspects (mind/soul) may often conflict with one another ultimately the higher aspects are in control.
Admittedly hormones and such play a big role in our day to day feel/function and have enough weight to throw us off course . Starting out I think we may be a 51/49 split of mind over matter but with self discipline and proper care of the human vessel in my experience that ratio only goes up to pass more control to the higher self.
Update: 9/6/12 Figure I'd clean this up and add in a shortcut to help anyone trapped in the loop of pining for women - most of what is considered "love" doesn't exist just sex. Read the end of this post for the explanation why. Otherwise original post below...