hide

Read Next

Cowboy Science

I've been thinking about this for a while. I fancy myself a scientist, which means I use the Scientific Method to figure things out. So I make a hypothesis, and try like crazy to falsify it, and at the end maybe there's some interesting not-yet-falsified ideas.

I train myself in all sorts of science, I keep real genuine article scientists as friends and compatriots. But y'know, I probably wouldn't be called a Scientist by the vast majority of people in this day and age.

So I started thinking. What is someone who does science who doesn't have impressive scientific credentials? And I came to - a Cowboy Scientist.

Cowboy Science is trying to figure out how things for practical reasons or for curiosity, not for academic or institutional prestige.

A rancher who tries to figure out what the best mix of water and grazing and movement for his cattle by takes notes, making a guess at what'll work, and testing that guess - he's doing science. But no one would call him a Scientist with a capital S.

My Politics...

....have become, roughly, "Different systems at different times for different people with different cultures pursuing different goals."

I believe in being principles-driven on a personal level, but on a large-group level it needs to be recognized that every generation faces different challenges.

I suppose if you paint with broad strokes you could say a few policies are almost always good, but even then that disintegrates if you try to nail down the particulars.

Let's say you're building a parliament from scratch in a new nation. How easy should it be for the members to deadlock?

This is not at all an easy or trivial question, and it has huge implications. Nations have at times lost everything by having a deadlocked government in time of crisis. The flipside is that unchecked authority in the hands of the current ruling party can quickly lead to either partisan strife where the two dominant parties keep reversing each other's policies as fast as they can get implemented, or despotism if rule is consolidated consistently in one side's hands.