I have been working a lot lately, but also rapidly studying historical eras. It is refreshing to realize that I do not have to do any one thing myself; in fact, is is ineffective. On our staff, I'm the most knowledgeable and effective historian, strategist, recruiter, trainer, marketer, and project manager. I'm also adequate-to-good in dozens of other roles, but I'm dispatching with almost all of them - and now, I'm starting to dispatch with project management (my first professional love) and marketing (my most recent professional love).
We have better legal, financial, sales, administration, management, and creative people than me. That's nice.
My time will be largely spent doing grand strategy, recruiting, training, and studying. I will mix in a little statistics and analysis, but this will be the bulk of my role going forwards. I do not need to laundry, I simply need to find someone competent to do it, and pay them well. There is something like a 1000x gap between successfully defining strategy with all the relevant contingencies, constructing completely workable models in identified big opportunities, and staffing those and training/compensating the staff well - and washing socks. The socks? I will not be doing that, because it would mean less time studying history, identifying opportunities, and finding/training/compensating very good people.
Thought of the day: Sparta and the Soviet Union both excelled at military arts by concentrating immense amounts of their society's total creative, intellectual, and productive output into military. This led them to be fierce warrior societies immediately after their rise, but with a gradual decline as they were out-paced by societies with a smaller military concentration and faster growth.
"Flex" societies that can gear up and gear down on war production can maintain a larger credible military presence with less resource drain. "War concentrated" societies show stronger than flex at first, but must win quickly or be defeated. Time is their enemy. Of course, pacifist societies are quickly conquered if they do not have allies, and thus do not enter the discussion.
Offered by a dumb college kid:
Keep your feet on the ground though while your head is up in the clouds.
It sounds like you are setting yourself up to be a grand strategist who just pulls the strings behind the scenes. Great place to be, really good for visionaries and big thinkers, very risky in the sense that you lose touch with the reality of the situation on the ground.
Sure, to do something that hasn't been done before, you do have to take leaps into nothingness. But if you don't ever look back from where you came from in your quest for fire, there might come a time when you have gone too far conceptually that not even the brightest treasure can show you a way back.
Worst comes to worst, you crash back down and start over with the bitter memories of a brillant but lost idea clouding your judgement as you try to piece your life back together. The standard advice is to stay just a little bit ahead of what your customers want conceptually and keep pulling them forward into the bright promised land you have found.
Stereotypical reference to Steve Jobs: the further he thought ahead, the harder he had to work at staying in the now. I'd argue that his perfectionism was necessary to keep him in now, and keep his LSD addled brain from floating away into the soft comfortable world of "This is a great idea, what if I did this, and then OH, what about that, it would be perfect, people would love it and me, this is such a good idea, it's perfect". It's easy to be a visionary, thinking ahead of your time, while realizing those dreams are exponential harder the further ahead you think. Tortured geniuses and what not.
What's cyclothymia? It's a mild form of the docs used to call "manic-depression," but which they re-name periodically. Cyclothymics can actually function decently well, and as such often don't know they've got it. If you cycle through highs and lows, are particularly artistic, or that describes someone you love, then read this post in full and please comment with your own experience. I'm still learning, myself.
AN INTRODUCTION TO CYCLOTHYMIA
Knowing the term "Cyclothymia" would have been very helpful to me a few years ago. This essay is plain English and, if I've done a good job, might help people who associate with a cyclothymic relate better to them, and might help a cyclothymic manage themselves better and produce better.
I'm against the "medical-ization" of life. We need medical terms, but we need to be able to explain things in plain English without labeling. Labeling, by definition, drastically simplifies.
Cyclothymia is simple at its roots, simple enough for a plain discussion without medicalization. Here's how it works for me -
Welcome to the party, all! Okay, by party, I mean nerdfest.
To start, a quick disclaimer. I do have interests outside my professional development. I love hot yoga, cooking, learning about wine, my pets, clever comedy sitcoms, and eating everything in sight when I travel. I also do mystery shopping on the side. However, this will focus on what I'm doing to maximize my master's experience as I prepare for doctorate-level training.
Think of this as a strategic professional development accountability plan. It actually breaks down to daily, weekly, monthly, and semesterly goals. (Is semesterly a word?). This is like self-directed independent study. The idea is to reflect on my goals as I'm working through them and keep myself accountable to getting them done. It's also worth noting I won't write about class often because the focus isn't on what I'm required to do.
It's about exploring opportunities for growth beyond the requirements. So, to augment the compulsory elements of my master's education, I aim to: