A reader, Noah, wrote me this -
I want to conduct an Experiment on personal productivity. I believe that if I had to show/tell people what I did each day I'd be more productive. Would you mind me sending you an e-mail with the same subject line everyday (You could automatically filter it to spam if you wanted). You don't have to read or respond, but I think knowing that you COULD read them would be hugely motivating. Again, this is just an experiment so I don't know how well it will work.
Let me know your thoughts!
All the Best,
I think this sounds like a lot of fun, and offered to start a thread on here as well. Noah will hopefully be updating us in the comments as the experiment progresses. This is quite cool. I'm excited to see what happens.
I've spent a lot of the last few days planning, so I don't have much to say I got done.
I haven't done much time tracking lately, but I can talk about the context switching. I've been using it for 4 days now, and it has made me HUGELY more productive. I must be rewiring my brain to know that I only work on my macbook and only surf on the ubuntu machine.
I didn't notice this until I started doing this, but what I'd do is work until I got stuck. Then I'd open up cnn, HN, or something like that and start surfing and never really get back to work. Now I keep working through that, because I'm in a context.
I think this first step makes other productivity hacks much more useful!
I spent most of today traveling around and generally out and about. Not much on the productivity side, but I wanted to introduce two ideas.
1. Context. I've set up two laptops in my office. One laptop is strictly for work, the other is for play. When I start to work on the play one, I move over to the work one and vice versa. The idea behind this is that there will develop a mental break that says, "When I sit on this computer, I work" and hopefully that will help prevent distractions.
2. I've created three groups that an activity can fall in. The first one is high impact, and I want this to be 60% of my time. The next is maintenance, planning, reading books, etc. That should account for 25% time. The last is 15% time and for me is basically messing around on the internet consumes 90% of this time. I'm sure other minor things could consume this time. This is a result of trying to plan out every 10 minute and then 30 minute block of time during the day and failing horribly at it. I think If I know what I want my day to look like, it shouldn't matter what order my day comes in.
Today was pretty unproductive. I did write quite a bit ~1000 words, and really fleshed out the first chapter and the forward. Obviously, there's more words to be written, but I know where I'm headed. I worked on cleaning up my downloads folder, desktop and general areas of clutter on my computer and on my desk. Not super productive, but not a complete loss.
An interesting observation though: If I'm aiming for 70% success, that's 109 days a year that I'm not productive. That's a lot! I wonder what the implications are of this? Most people probably fail to be productive 100 days a year?
Today I did the following:
1. Installed Git and XAMP, configured and downloaded repos, worked on setting up development environment for front end of website.
2. 2 hour Skype chat on virtual office infrastructure, figured out what to do for each category and figured out where to go from there.
3. Worked through first chapter of ebook and outlined storyline and narrative. Collected important facts, dates, names. Ready to write tomorrow morning.
It feels unproductive. If I can execute on 1 and 3 tomorrow, I think I'll feel like today was worth it.
Here's what all I got done today:
1. Walked someone through setting up virtualbox on their mac over skype
2. Evaluated software for our startups 'virtual office'
3. Worked on clients website and fixed a bunch of small annoying minor issues
4. Published new massive 2000+ word blog post. Had Ramit Sethi (new york times best selling author) book mark it.
5. Restarted ebook writing by deleting everything because I wasn't happy with how how well the different parts connected. Found more sources to tie everything together, worked on outline, and found more topics to research.
All in all, I'd say it was a more productive day than if I didn't have to type up what all I did. I think I could have been even more productive. I'll be back tomorrow with another update!
You could also try out http://www.stickk.com/ :-)
I haven't tried it myself, but that is a site that is created especially for that sort of thing.
Over the summer I was working for a small green-technology startup. I was working from home so I had to email my boss at the end of each working day with what I'd done. That accountability was really good in motivating me to maintain productivity.
Mike Radivis just asked asked some good questions on "Chase Meaning, Not Happiness" -
How do you measure meaning if not in terms of happiness? Aren't things that create more happiness for a longer time for a larger number of individuals better than those things who lack those qualities but are proclaimed to be personal achievements anyway? Does the scope of happiness make happiness meaningful to you or not? What are achievements good for if they aren't good at facilitating happiness? Imagine you wouldn't experience any pleasant or unpleasant emotions and would have to decide rationally what to pursue (assuming that is possible at all). Then what you want to do with your life? (Another way to formulate this question maybe would be to ask what's your grand strategy in that situation.)
I'm quite interested in your answers. I like that your blog posts are so outspoken. It's just that the message of this post is hard for me to grasp, as I'm pretty much utilitarian in my thinking.
Good questions. I'll go through it line by line.
How do you measure meaning if not in terms of happiness?
We rarely go to the movies; it's expensive and all too often we leave disappointed in what we've seen. When a highly anticipated film opens we sometimes make an exception; "Noah" was such an event. Sadly, we were disappointed again.
We're Christians. Snake-handling lunatics? Poison-sipping crazies? No. We ARE regular churchgoers who take fairly active roles in church activities. Our goal in life is to live in as Christ-like a manner as we can. We know we'll never reach that goal, but we try.
Hollywood has produced some wonderful movies about the Bible. Not one of them has been 100% accurate so far as I know, and "Noah" certainly isn't. In my opinion it's science fiction based very, very loosely on the Bible's account of the Great Flood.
Numerous people have commented that the film has to fictionalize or embellish the story in order to fill out a full-length feature film. Maybe so. You can read the Biblical account of Noah in five minutes, tops. Unfortunately, this movie carries the embellishment a little too far for me. At the end of the Book of Revelations is a stern warning against changing so much as one word of the Scriptures... and this movie changes far more than that.
If people see the film and it interests them enough that they read and discuss the Biblical account, then the movie has done a wonderful thing. However, if the film makes people believe the Bible is science fiction... well, that's another story.