The Non-Designer's Design Book - Robin Williams
The Eight-Circuit Brain: Navigational Strategies for the Energetic Body - Antero Alli
Angel Tech - Antero Alli (parts of it, as part of assignments in the above book)
The Lean Startup - Eric Ries
Destroy the Opposition - Jamie "Chaos and Pain" Lewis
To Be Or Not To Be Intimidated - Robert Ringer
4-Hour Chef - Tim Ferriss
I am focussing on the first two, and the rest are here and there.
Check out Theodore J. Kaczynski's "Technological Slavery", a book that's (yes, the Unabomber) released from Florence Supermax recently. Will blow your hair back quite a bit. Also, Noam Chomsky's "Manufacturing Consent" and "Year 501".
Right now I'm re-reading Steve Pavlina's "Personal development for smart people".
I think it's a brilliant framework book for personal development, and I would be very curious to hear if Sebastian has read it. The book posits a framework where Truth, Love and Power make up the totality of personal development.
SM strikes me as a dude who has the Power part of PD down pat. Power is basically action, getting things done on the ground, the Warrior's path. Truth is concepts, knowledge, the Magician's path. And Love is appreciation, connections, passion, the Lover's path. Pavlina says that the combination of all three is Intelligence, which I suppose would be the King's path in the Jungian archetype framework.
Here are some reviews:
First time I saw it I didn't take it seriously. Now, I'll check it out. Thanks.
I can imagine you wrote him off because he may seem a bit woo-woo and far out?
Exactly. And I'm in general running away from 'personal developement' works; enough of pnl and stuff like that for me, I've already had a lot of that in my life in the past years.
I do prefer sites like this one or Tynan's, where someone is authentic, don't try to teach anything, just share what they learn.
When I do need help, I prefer going around things scientifically proved (not stuff like T. Robbins.).
For the last few years I moved around a lot so I didn't really accumulate books (when you periodically need to fit your belongings into a suitcase, books are the first to go). This meant my approach to books was: acquire - read - discard, and it also meant I bought less books ('cause, why buy a book you won't get around to reading?)
I'm planning to stay in my current place for a while, so I've started accumulating again. I think it's actually quite good to have a "personal library" of books around that are half-read or unread - you can pick them up when the mood or need strikes you and slowly gain knowledge by osmosis. Sounds inefficient, but I think it's closer to how our minds really work. (Physical books are much better than Kindle books for this, btw).
Books lying around my apartment right now that I'm currently reading:
- The Black Swan (where I got the personal library idea from - the author mentions meeting Benoit Mandelbrot, who kept a huge personal library to remind himself of the limits of his own knowledge)
- How Proust can change your life
- Biography of Benjamin Franklin - read the autobiography, the biography goes into a lot more depth, I really want to make time to finish this one
- Civilisation, Niall Ferguson
- Not a book but I find this website continually fascinating: http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/
"Flow" by the guy with the unspellable last name that starts with C. It's good.
This book fits the criteria http://www.amazon.com/Flow-P-S-ebook/dp/B000W94FE6
The guy is Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. I wonder in what language that name is easily spellable or even speakable.
Seb, I finally got a copy of "Rise of the House of Rothschild" -- did you read this thing cover to cover?
Dude, put your focus on the first 11% (or so) of Tim Ferris book (meta-learning). Really, best shit he ever wrote so far, amazing. After that, you can try to learn how to cook and stuff.
Now reading (don't like audiobooks a lot, since I can't retain much information through them):
- This Will Make You Smarter: 150 New Scientific Concepts to Improve Your Thinking by John Brockman
- How to Read a Book by Mortimer J. Adler
- Influence, by Robert Cialdini
- Godel, Escher and Bach by Douglas R. Hofstadter
- Galactic Exploration by Peter Cawdron (scifi)
- The Prince, by Machiavel (so far, a little bit overrated, IMO)
The most important book I read last year, the one that calyzed more changes was Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality, by Yudkowsky. No matter whether you like the original series or no, this fanfic about rationality (duh!), science and psychology is just awesome.
I'm reading Casanova's Memoirs right now. I thought this was really insightful -
The theory of morals and its usefulness through the life of man can be compared to the advantage derived by running over the index of a book before reading it when we have perused that index we know nothing but the subject of the work. This is like the school for morals offered by the sermons, the precepts, and the tales which our instructors recite for our especial benefit. We lend our whole attention to those lessons, but when an opportunity offers of profiting by the advice thus bestowed upon us, we feel inclined to ascertain for ourselves whether the result will turn out as predicted; we give way to that very natural inclination, and punishment speedily follows with concomitant repentance. Our only consolation lies in the fact that in such moments we are conscious of our own knowledge, and consider ourselves as having earned the right to instruct others; but those to whom we wish to impart our experience act exactly as we have acted before them, and, as a matter of course, the world remains in statu quo, or grows worse and worse.
Casanova likens learning morals before getting real world experience to reading the index of a book before the book itself. You get an idea of what's going to be in the book, but you don't really "get it."
It's kind of subtle, but I laughed a lot at him saying everyone feels the need to against what they were taught, have things go badly because of their choice, but then they feel consoled that they can now teach others. Hilarious stuff.
I'm enjoying Casanova's Memoirs. Interesting book. It's out of copyright, and thus free at Gutenberg.org - here's the first section in plain text - http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/2951/pg2951.txt
CBS news recently featured the site Stickk.com, created by two Yale professors that helps people ’stick with’ their goals. The testimonials section of the site has stories about people who successfully lost weight, spend more time studying and conquered their own goals. They did so because the key feature of the site is that participants need to commit a dollar value to their goal. As the founders – economists – are apt to think, if people have a financial commitment to an action or lack of actions they will be more likely to continue with them. Not only that but the site allows members to have the money they put up to go to an anti-charity, supposedly strengthening their motivation. If the participants self report they were successful in their work they keep the money, if not it goes to the charity or anti-charity of their choice. A strong motivation.
In perhaps an accidental similarity GlaxoSmithKline developed a drug that makes even the anti-charities motivations look minimal. They developed Alli* the over-the-counter brand of orlistat, an obesity prevention drug designed to help prevent the absorption of fats from the human diet and reduce caloric intake. Alli’s promotions show testimonials about how the pills allowed people to manage their diet in a way that helped them lose weight. What the commercials don’t explicitly explain is that Alli works by blocking the absorption of fat into the intestines, instead sending down the digestive path, all the way down. The product’s fine print warns about the potential for this anal leakage, informing customers that keeping a change of clothes around during the first week of taking Alli is suggested as users are adapt to any unexpected or ignored fat in their meals. What the consumers and makers of Alli might not realize is that in this case, anal leakage is a good thing.
For both Stickk and Alli there are strong motivations for the participants to continue with the program because both have high levels of buy in. In 1959 an experiment was done with college women who wanted to participate in a discussion of the psychology of sex. The women were told they needed to be ’screened’ before they could officially join the discussion but unaware there were three different levels of the screening. Researchers wanted to examine how different screening processes affected the womens’ attitudes about the group. The first group had no initiation or screening and those women were told they could join the discussion. A second group went through a mild initiation of saying sexual but not obscene words and the final group’s initiation included saying sexually obscene words that the researches felt might embarrass the women. Each group was then allowed to listen to a taped conversation – which the researchers designed to be very boring – and offer their opinions of the group. In what’s termed ‘justification of effort’ those women in the first group, who were simply let in, reported the group boring while those in the third group reported the discussion interesting and worthwhile. The experimenters found that our nature for justification and explanations is accelerated by a costly experience. They reasoned that those women who said profanely sexual words needed to rate the discussion higher or else their experience seemed for naught.
If participants put forth a greater effort they will be more likely to continue the process because as ‘social animals‘ we want to be perceived as logical and consistent among our peers. No one wants to go through a challenging, boring or costly experience and not have something to show for it. A liberal doesn’t want to make a donation to George W. Bush’s presidential library – as is an option at Stickk – because they weren’t able to continue with their goals, it’s embarrassing. Alli inadvertently takes that idea even further with the product’s side effects. People who quite literally shit their pants for a cause or goal are more likely to stick with those goals to justify those very side effects. In the competitive field of weight loss products the difference between experiencing anal leakage and not might make Alli the best option for committed weight loss. It’s unlikely that this sort of persuasion will squeeze its way into the Alli promotions but if so the users’ commitment will likely grow even stronger. Whether anal leakage or political distaste is a stronger source of justification remains up for debate but in both cases the participants have strong reasons to remain committed.
*The formal product name is alli with an lowercase a though most written articles capitalize the A