I had a short but great conversation with my friend Yifei Zhang. He manages to consistently get immensely large amounts of things done. Recently I've had more business growth than I can keep up with -- meaning we had to put the breaks on sales to some extent and focus on getting our fulfillment processes tighter, and trying to make long-term business development not suffer in the process.
I asked Yifei's take, and he had some great insights:
"I try to orient my attention that the lowest possible level of detail for the day, going up only when things are done. For example, your tree might look:
Development, Marketing, Biz Dev, HR, ...
Under development might be:
New prototype, Support Issues, QA, ...
And under each of those would be more granular tasks
I know I'll get overwhelmed if I look into everything under "Development" today
So I pick one of it's subtasks and pretend that it's the only thing I'm working on today, putting everything above it out of mind."
I replied, "Huh! That's incredibly obvious when said like that, but basically no-one does it that way."
Yifei: It still relies on a lot of willpower (I still get sucked into "off task" activities all the time). But that's what I aim for. A clean transition between "Strategy mode" and "Execution mode."
Yifei went on to explain that you zoom out, see the whole battlefield, but once you zoom in to an individual task you want to make it like there's nothing else to do, and focus exclusively on the one thing until it's done, and thus not get overwhelmed or confused.
Very useful insights. Clean transition -- think and plan, but when you act, do just one thing.
It's not rocket science, but almost everyone neglects to do it like that -- and suffers because of it.
Have you tried setting a hard limit on how many hours you work? It sounds silly but I found when I made a commitment not to spend more than XX hours on income generation I started to think much more strategically about the use of my time. Without the hardcap I would just try to work more and burn myself out rather than optimizing my time and delegating.
When you say hard limit, do you mean something like "3 hours" or something like 8 ? This is an extract from an old program called "outfox your flaw" (not verbatim) :
"Look at your time differently : if you go to the office 8 hours, but you make 2 hours worth of works (25% effectiveness). So : if you realize that, then only spend 2,5hours at the office, and fill all this time. You'll get into work mode much faster. When you get at 90/100% effectiveness, you can increase the time spent there if needed."
I've tried this lately and find that I actually get more done in 2 times 2 hours than before trying to stay 8 hours at it.
At the time I was working 60 hour weeks and generally an unhealthy wreck so I limited myself to 40. My original comment was meant to impart some generic advice:
If you think and act like your working hours are unlimited you won't look for ways to optimize them.
As for an actual blueprint I think my ideal work hours looks something like this:
I find my capacity for work decreases with each sprint I do and in the morning I can generally last longer, give more focus, and achieve more flow.
Edit: I gave up on financial goals in late 2011 after some huge financial and artistic wins... money shouldn't be taken too seriously. For the record, they were all basically on track, some were being massively exceeded, others were a bit behind schedule, but were all happening.
I set my next 10 years of financial goals on June 28th. That was exactly a month ago.
1 year - Critical Thinking [my first book] out. Blog income trickling. Some info products. Some freelancing. Something else, some X-Factor thing bringing in cash. Net monthly income positive. Health insurance. $50,000 in the bank. Expenses = income per month minimum.
3 years - 3 to 5 books out, many products out, blog income robust, some working on big exciting deals. $10,000 per month total, $5000 passive at least. First property owned. $300,000 in the bank.
5 years - 7-10 books out, many many products out, many passive income internet properties, working on big exciting things, $50,000 per month total, $40,000 passive at least. $1,000,000 in the bank.
I’ve always thought a complete list of the Internet’s top personal development blogs would be a fantastic resource. As the saying goes, great minds think alike. Steven Aitchison and Brendan Baker have put together some awesome lists over the past couple years that clearly took a tremendous amount of effort to put together.
I’ve found lots of great blogs through their lists. There were also many blogs that didn’t resonate with me, but that’s to be expected with lists as large as the ones they’ve compiled. I’ve benefited hugely from Brendan and Steven’s lists, and I greatly appreciate the effort they put into them.
Reading there lists inspired me to put together my own list of personal development blogs, but from a different angle.
What’s Different About My List?
Well for one my list only includes 32 blogs. Why 32? Because 50 and 100 are just too many. At that point you’re beginning to sacrifice quality for quantity, and it’s been shown that when you give people too many choices they get overwhelmed and refuse to pick any of them. I also decided to use 32 rather than 30 because it’s unconventional and goes against the grain which is a huge part of personal development.